Pages

Wednesday, 13 February 2013

Einstein Backwards

                                        Einstein Backwards

     Einstein's gravity model, which he said took over 40 years to develop, can be explained by placing a ball on a soft covered pool table. The ball sinks. Hence space is curved around the mass of a star. When an approaching planet falls into this curved space it circles the star, therefore explaining gravity. Einstein's model suggests that the large mass of the Sun defines the curvature of space and that space is somehow two dimensional from the perspective of the planet. As the planet orbits this curved space they are forced to follow space's curvature. Space is somehow 2 dimensional filled with these tiny curved pockets.

     How would a planet's orbit follow an elliptical orbit and still maintain it's flat orbit in a curved space? These curved planetary orbits are not observed in the Solar System. If the orbits of the solar planets were circular as demonstrated in this model and not elliptical, then the planets would have no change in velocity throughout their orbits. Planets do have variable changing velocities in their orbits, as discovered by the great German Physics Kepler. As they approach the Sun the planets accelerate to their maximum velocity at the point of their perigee. Conversely their velocities decrease as they approach the point of apogee.

       Does Einstein's model properly demonstrate what is observed in the Solar System?

      The planets orbit the solar system on a plane. The exact opposite to Einstein's theory of curved space. How would this model demonstrate nine planets with the exception of Pluto, exhibiting a flat plane when orbiting the Sun? How would you even  attempt to illustrate this model of nine planets in curved space with a flat orbital plane? There is no curvature to the planet's orbits as predicted by Einstein's curved space theory.



Diagram of Einstein's curved space

      Newton's law of gravity, defined gravity as a relationship between two Masses and there distance.
      Einstein's theory suggested that curved space defines gravity.

      The problem with both of these explanations to demonstrate gravity is that both are unable to explain many simple observed behaviors. Why are some orbits perfectly circular and others elliptical?
       Einstein received his Nobel Award for a paper identifying light having mass, so then why does light react differently then other masses, when passing near the sun?

       1) Objects as in, planets and comets, accelerate as they approach the Sun, but light's observed velocity, in contrast slows. This is a discrepancy. If space is curved would they both not react the same?

       2) How does curved space demonstrate elliptical orbits?

       3) How does curved space explain why the planets with the smallest mass, Mars and Mercury, have the most severe elliptical orbits?      

       4) How does curved space demonstrate 9 planets orbiting the Sun on a flat plane?

       5) How does curved space explain the fact that many comets and asteroids orbit the Sun perpendicular to the solar plane?

       6) As a planets orbits this 2 dimensional curved space it also has moons that simultaneously are orbiting the planets defined curved space, as the planet orbits it's Sun. How does Einsteins field equations account for these 2 curved spaces interacting and existing in the same curved space? Many of these moons in the solar system orbit their planets several million km. from the surface of the planets, which would extend them far from the Sun's curved space dimension.

       7) Probably the most troubling flaw in the curved space theory. If gravity is defined as curved space and equals to the values of Newton's gravity equations, then why were Shapiro's experiments to determine time/ space alteration value, so small.
, (the Einstein field equations are a set of non-linear second-order partial differential equations in the metric, and imply the curvature of space time is equivalent to a gravitational field)

       8) Another troubling problem for curved space defining gravity is the Shapiro's experiments were done many times, and found that the time/space values decreased and disappeared rapidly with only small  incremental distance changes from the Sun. With these time/space values disappearing how would this support the expansive solar system required gravity?

One must remember; Shapiro's experiments are used by those supporting Einstein's theory as proof that his theory's are correct. In actual fact they do the opposite. 

       9) The biggest question for curved space theory to overcome is scientific. If curved space reflects gravity then the force of gravity must also be curved.

      That is a BIG problem for Einstein's theory. The vector force of gravity from the Sun extends from the centre of the mass  through the equator of the Sun to the centre of the mass of the planet. There is no curved gravity force in Newton's gravity equation. There is no curvature to gravity. When an object is reacting to the gravity of another mass, does it follow a straight line or a curved line? When a large passenger airliner is landing on an airstrip, does it have to make minor correction due to the curvature of gravity. Planets do not orbit around the Sun on a curved line. Galaxies orbit their central mass of a Black Hole extending from it's mass, and are flat.

     Andromeda Galaxy pictured below shows no curvature. The galaxy's of the Universe are almost flat as a pancake, as they extend outwards  some hundreds of light years from the central mass of their Black Hole. Black Holes the largest formed mass in the Universe do NOT curve space.


                                

N. Tesla stated on Einstein's curved time/space theory that it is not observed and is impossible to exist.
"Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible - But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature."

Newton clearly stated gravity acts as a straight line;  The gravitational attraction force between two point masses is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of their separation distance. The force is always attractive and acts along the line joining them.
10) The final problem facing the curved space theory; Einstein's theory of curved space contradicts itself.
If as Einstein suggest that a star's mass curves space, then curve space is predetermined by the mass of the star, therefore pre-exists. This would put gravity as defined as curved space as instantaneous.
This detracts from Einstein's theory that the force of gravity cannot exceed the speed of light..
A clear contradiction.. 
If gravity is predetermined, and exists as a condition of space as defined  by the mass of a star...(curved space) then it must always exist and the force it implies must be therefore instant.
       If gravity is instant, it travel faster than light.
       
     Einstein's very complex field equations are attempting to explain a very complex universe by a very overly simple explanation of a 2 dimensional curved space theory that is NOT demonstrated or observed in nature.

Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in PURPLE whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are meta physicists rather than scientists."
-Nicola Tesla      
                                               The Two Forces of the Universe

    Newton stated there are 3 states that determine an orbit by 2 bodies in space.

     1) Distance
     2) velocity
     3) mass
What is the force or mechanism of gravity? This question continues to be unanswered

Einstein knew this unseen force could not be a simple detectable Newton force, so he postulated that gravity must be a wave. To be Newton like, Einstein wanted to be more than just a man of theory, so he developed his equation of General Relativity, using Gravity waves to prove this theory.
His initial theory that gravity is a wave held some promise, but to prove it by a nonlinear equation, was a bit of a reach.   

There are a number of  problems with his theory that are difficult to overcome.
His theory states  that mass produces a gravity wave..so what is the mechanism that mass has to produce, to create a gravity wave?
The most obvious next problem. What is a gravity wave, and how can it be detected or can it be detected, and why is it not continuously detected?
The most disturbing problem with a gravity wave is it causes a loss of energy and ultimately a loss of mass for the object. Has this ever been observed in our solar system as a decaying orbit?

Could our solar system even exist if orbital decay was present?

     There exists two forces of gravity that are observable in the Universe. These forces are distinctly different and distinct. 1st is Newton's gravity, while the 2nd is The Corona Effect that alters time and space.

     The first force of the Universe is Gravity;
      
         Newtons gravity force, The Mass of the Star, planet or even a Black Hole produces the force of gravity at it's "x" axis which extents from it's equator. This produces orbits that are perfectly flat as observed by the orbits of the rings of Saturn. The orbits are not only on a flat plane extending from the equator, but they are perfectly circular, and non elliptical. A good visible example of this is in the photo below.

                 

            

Notice above and below in the photo of Saturn taken from Cassini and it's rings. Saturn's rings are perfectly circular, and are flat as they extend outward from Saturn's equator. Their orbits are not elliptical.
                                 
     Mars two moons have orbits that are also circular, rather than the elliptical orbits that would have be predicted by Kepler's Second Law. Mar's moon's orbits though are not exactly aligned with Mar's equator.

     The Second Force of the Universe is the Force of Elliptical Orbits. The Corona Effect 
      This is seen in the motion of the planetary orbits around the Sun. The Force of Elliptical orbit follows the laws of Kepler. Our planet Earth, like the Sun, also exhibits this force. This is seen as the Moon's orbit being slightly elliptical,

       Elliptical orbits are produced by the Sun/star/black holes, large spinning magnetic field that contracts space, and accelerates the body as it approaches. This contraction of space nearest our Sun occurs in the Corona. The Corona effect alters time and space.

      This can be explained by 2 ropes the same length.
Rope 1 is stretched out straight between 2 points. Time and distance are closely related. The relationship is 2 dimensional. Rope 1 travels in distance.
Rope 2 is coiled up. Though its length is the same as rope 1,  the space it occupies is much less as it has condensed space. Time and space now form a 3 dimensional altered space. Rope 2 travels in space.
Rope 2 has altered time and space. Time now no longer coexists with distance. 

      Though  both ropes are the same length they travel in different dimensions.

The Sun's corona causes this effect. Einstein predicted that light would slow as it passed near the Sun 100 microseconds and contract space by 30 km. Objects accelerate as they approach the Sun's Corona while time and light slows. Any increase in distance from the Sun's Corona this  phenomenon     disappears.