Pages

Saturday, 23 August 2014

For Man To Become God


     A number of interesting experiments were conducted in the mid 60's, by a team of scientists led by Irwin Shapiro. Shapiro devised an experiment to prove Einstein's relativity of time slowing and the Sun's gravity would curve space thereby forcing light to travel a longer distance as it passed by the Sun. This delta change in time could be measured by Shapiro's experiment.

 His experiment was to direct a radar signal to Saturn and have the signal bounce off Saturn and then upon it's return to earth measure the time incurred. He would then repeat the experiment with the Sun essentially between the Earth and Saturn. This experiment was eventually done using a number of planets and the effect of the planets seems to be quite negligible.

     As previously determined when light passes the Sun or star it takes longer to complete the round trip. This was confirmed by Shapiro's experiment.

     Now with the results of his experiments he was now able to "reverse engineer" an equation to satisfy the results. He knew all of Einstein's 10 equations of relativity theory equations including those on mass and gravity and how it would alter time space, so he used Einstein's theories to develop his equation.

     Shapiro knew the following
1) c, Speed of light
2) G, Newton's Gravity Constant
3) M, Mass of the Sun
4) GM, Therefore he was able to calculate the Sun's gravity constant.
5) Distances from Earth to Saturn,

     His final equation, is stated as

\Delta t=-\frac{2GM}{c^3}\log(1-\mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{x})

and really an extension in many ways to Schwarzschild's equation determined in 1916.

     When a scientists "reverse engineers" an equation to prove a theory, it often becomes a self fulfilling result. Shapiro used Schwarschild's equations which gave more of an exact solution to Einstein's field equations, which describe the interactions of gravity as it curves space time. By using an extension of Einstein's theory your conclusions are already predetermined and become self fulfilling. Is this scientific?

     For a moment let us go back in time to 1964. Only this time it's not Shapiro that is conducting these experiments but someone named Straw Walker. There is also one other important difference...Einstein has never been born. Now would the resulting equation be the same?

     After the conclusion of these same experiments; Straw Walker is amazed that time/space is somehow altered by the Sun, but unlike Einstein, he doesn't see that the mass and gravity of the Sun is relevant. (remember Einstein's equation does't exist)

     Straw Walker believes the spinning magnetic field of the Sun is causing the time space distortion. He also believes as that light travels in the medium of time. This is opposite to Einstein's theory that light travels in the medium of the curved space as it by passes the mass of the Sun. This curved space acts as a 2 dimensional  plane, as it warps around the mass of the Sun.

     Straw Walker alternatively uses the magnetic field of the Sun to "reverse engineer" an equation to come up with the exact detected results. As in both equations the time variance is not dependent on the total distant travelled by the beam, but only as it passes near the Sun. Whether the beam is bounced off Mars or Jupiter the results will remain constant.

     Maxwell was a Tesla/Einstein type genius. His equations developed in the mid 1800's were laws that showed the interaction of electricity, magnetic fields and magnetism. They were laws because their results were tested by various experiments, though today in some instances they do not apply. His equation were left on the very doorstep of Einstein's later equations of light and time.

     Straw Walker uses Maxwell's equations to demonstrate that the Sun's magnetic field is distorting space time, and not the mass of the Sun. Instead of producing a curvature to space, the Sun magnetic field contracts space and slows time nearest the Sun. As an object enters this contracted space it accelerates to it's nearest point to the sun, (perigee) as demonstrated by a planet's orbits and then slows as it leaves this contracted space. Light reacts quite differently to the Sun's magnetic field. Instead of light's relative velocity increasing, it does the opposite and slows.

      The real question is why? Einstein won his Nobel Prize by stating that light has mass, so then why is there a discrepancy between a planet velocity increasing and light's relative velocity decreasing.

      Light doesn't travel in the medium of space, but travels in the medium of time. As time is slowed by the Sun's magnetic field the speed of light appears to us as slowing. The  velocity of light is left unchanged but it's medium is slowed therefore a delta time is observed. Like an aircraft flying in it's medium of air and facing a head wind, the aircraft's air speed indicator is unchanged, but it's ETA to it's destination as changed. This is what happens to light as it enters into altered time. Light appears to slow from the observer, as if facing a head wind of slowing time, which results in a change in it's time of arrival.

Maxwell commented in 1864: "agreement of the results seems to show that light and magnetism are affections of the same substance, and that light is an electromagnetic disturbance propagated through the field according to electromagnetic laws."

     Therefore Straw Walker deducted that the Sun's magnetic field and NOT the mass of the Sun was causing the anomalies in the time/space results as light passed near the Sun.

     The conclusions reached either by contracted space or curved space were exactly the same except the theories are different. It's like Einstein's theory is 2+2 =4, while Straw Walker's equation is 3+1 =4. Both give the same results but from different theories.

     From a practical sense there is one extremely important difference in these two theories. Einstein's equations using mass to distort time/space cannot be artificially reproduced while Straw Walkers equation to simulate slowing of time and contracting space can be man made.. By controlling time and space, man then; "Has become God."

     Maxwell Wave Equation; States any Electromagnetic Plane wave travels at the speed of light and acts as light.


 \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf E}{\partial t^2} - \nabla^2 \mathbf E = 0\,, \quad
 \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf B}{\partial t^2} - \nabla^2 \mathbf B = 0\,,


Straw Walker knows;
1) Maxwell's equations
2) Magnetic field  of the Sun
3) c speed of light
4) d distances between planets
5) Shapiro's results
6) B Sun's magnetic field

Thus find c; by inserting Shapiro's time difference of 200 microsecond into the equation.
c will show a small decrease in speed, indicating a slowing of time.

     In essence Man has become God

 Arabic word for doubt is;  شك

     In the 1st Century Islamic scientists believed that the 1st step to advance science was to doubt. In their time it was to doubt the ancient Greek understanding of the Cosmology of the Universe and particularly the Solar system and how the observed solar system related to mathematical data.

     It is the same today. We must always doubt if science is to advance. Does Einstein's theory of curved space to explain gravity relate to what's observed? The planets orbit in the Solar System on a flat plane and show no orbital curve. The galaxies are flat as a pancake as they orbit their central mass of the black holes and show no curvature to their orbits. If curved space exists and explains gravity then why does light "slow" as it passes through curved space and planets passing through this same curved space accelerate, as they follow Kepler's 2nd law? If space is curved would not they both react the same?

     Einstein studied Maxwell's equations and used his ideas to eventually allow him to develop his own equations.  Why did Einstein do a 180 degree turn from Maxwell's equations which were proven by experiment and use mass and Newton's gravity constant in his equation when Maxwell clearly stated that light is related to a electromagnetic phenomenon and not related to mass?

     Later in 1888 Heinrich Hertz released an important paper relating to Maxwell's earlier studies. He went on to conduct experiments to verify that electromagnetic waves exhibit lightlike behaviors of reflection, refraction, diffraction, and polarization, and later determined empirically the speed of wave travel is the same as the speed of light.  Previous to this, electromagnetic fields travelling in space were not understood, but from these findings, Einstein later developed his gravity wave theory that he postulated would travel through space. 

     Was Einstein wrong? To doubt is the 1st sign of genius.

     The Rosetta satellite upon landing on Comet 67P would give the scientific community an excellent  opportunity to test Einstein's curved space theory.

                        

     Have the Rosetta satellite's probe fix it's instruments on the North star as it orbits the Sun. If Einstein is correct and mass curves space, then as the comet orbit is close to it's perigee there should be an angle deflection, indicating the satellite and comet are travelling in a curved path.

     I predict NO such angle deflection is noted.


For further reading;  {Pulsars; The Universe's Most Powerful Object Blog}

Monday, 18 August 2014

Why is it Difficult to Advance Knowlege


                                                     Advancing knowledge

     Human beliefs once indoctrinated in our youth are stronger than steel. They do not bend or break. Take religious beliefs. Religious beliefs taught to a youth, are with us the rest of our lives and influence the choices we make. Just look at the Christian community of the United States and how these beliefs transcend to daily living and more importantly foreign policy.

      The Middle East and their religious beliefs and how this interacts with their daily lives and international policies. Beliefs once learned and adopted are impossible to bend.

     Not just religious beliefs, but academic knowledge of well known theories, when taught at a young impressionable age becomes doctrine. Young teenage students leaving home and entering University are extremely impressionable and are the first to accept, new and exciting beliefs.

     In the settings and surrounding of this new University life they are quick to believe, such theories as Einsteins equation of General Relativity, which includes Gravity Waves and Orbital decay as part of the equation, which neither have been detected in the Solar System. Einstein's curved space theory becomes easily accepted, but cannot be demonstrated in nature, as the planets in the Solar system orbit the Sun on a flat plane and show no sign of curved space. The theories of Big Bang and Dark Matter are quickly taught as facts and not as they should be as just another theory.

                                              {Einstein Backwards Blog}

    There is nothing wrong with having theories, after all; how does scientific knowledge advance without someone taking academic chances. Theories are necessary in the thinking process.

    The problem arise when theories are taught as fact.This then has the opposite effect and actually limits the advancement of knowledge.

   This can only be more highlighted by the findings by the University of Northern Carolina.



*  More Soft Dinosaur Tissue, Now from an "80 Million" Year Old Hadrosaur: Consistent with the expectations of biblical creationists, according to Nat'l Geographic, there's yet another discovery of soft tissue in a dinosaur, this time, a hadrosaur, with soft blood vessels, connective tissue, and blood cell protein amino acid chains partially sequenced at Harvard University. This allegedly 80-million year-old non-fossilized duck-billed dinosaur tissue was discovered by a team led by researchers at North Carolina State University. Harvard, et al., wanted to get some soft dinosaur tissue so they put together a team and just went out and found some. Consider all the potential soft tissue, and perhaps even DNA, lost to humanity because of secular universities ignoring previous claims by young-earth creationists due to the false evolutionary timescale which so biased paleontologists that they would never even look for non-decomposed original biological tissue inside of dinosaur bones.

     Nobody is denying that Dinosaurs existed and that they are now extinct. The question is when did they go extinct.
The fact that soft tissue has been found really puts in question whether Dinosaurs went extinct 65 to 70 million years ago. 

     The possibility of soft tissue still existing after nearly 100 million years is  NOT believable.    

     There is more evidence that Dinosaurs did not go extinct 70 million years ago.

     






     There is numerous cave drawing of Dinosaurs and these drawing are NOT 75 million years old. In fact they are not 100 thousand years old, but more like less than 10 thousand years  old..

    
                                            



                                             

    Numerous figurines through out the world show distinctly that dinosaurs existed on earth and were drawn and formed into figurines by ancient man that were on earth 10 thousand years ago.

    If numerous facts, point to Dinosaurs living on earth 10 thousand years ago and were not extinct 70 million years ago as understood and believed, then why does not the scientific community not accept these finding and change their beliefs?

     They cannot.

     Once beliefs are learned they become steel; they do not bend or break. Anthropologist have spent their entire careers preaching their doctrine. They are not to be doubted, so instead of having interest in finding the "truth of Human History" they will take whatever measures necessary to disavow and discredit all those that may suggest that the finding in Northern Carolina are true..

     That is the measure of advancing knowledge.....it becomes extremely difficult simply by the nature of man.
Their beliefs become their doctrine and their doctrine becomes dogma.

Advancements or Improvements


     The great advancements in human history occurred shortly after the turn of the 1900 hundreds, with some of the worlds greatest inventions and discoveries occurring during the Second World War. Mankind literally went from horse and buggy to rockets and jets in a matter of 50 years. This  period was truly was the age of of enlightenment.
     The gasoline and diesel engines were developed during this time and still in use today. The consumer use of electricity was introduced with the exclusive help of Tesla and powers our world today. The telephone, radio, radar and sonar were all founded early for today's world of consumer and military products. Two Germans and a Swede discovered nuclear fission  in 1938 and soon after an atomic bomb was used in war, and saw the beginning study of nuclear physics.BMW and Messerschmidt developed the first production jet aircraft with the use of swept wing technology during WW2. A great German scientist developed the first mass produced rocket that later in America would put a man on the moon. Messerschmidt developed a rocket powered jet, the Comet, that nearly broke the sound bearer during the war, and could have if the German's had the time to develop it  further. Even technologies that are considered new as in superconductivity were discovered early in the 1900's. The development of plastics and the field of organic chemistry along with their numerous organic reactions were discovered years ago.
     No other period in history can match this short 50 year period. Science was born in this short time frame.
     What does all this say in relation to modern post WW2 discoveries? 
     There has been some notable consumer product improvements, computers using circuit boards instead of tubes, phones are now carried as hand held devices instead of a phone on a desk at home, dishwasher and clothes washers have automatic cycles, and there are numerous more antibiotics now than in WW2, but all these are just improvements not great discoveries.

     If all the discoveries in man's history were given a predetermine value of importance, starting in the horse and buggy era of 1900 to our modern world today it would only be a value of ONE.

     If mankind is to discover and colonize the Universe a discovery value of 1000 will be required.
Man's knowledge cannot be stuck in a dogma of religious views and  academic egos.
Knowledge has often stalled in the past as it has now. A sailor on one of  Columbus's ships discovering the new world would have been well at home on a naval ship in America's war against King George in their war of independence.

      A theoretical physics professor was once asked. "What's new in physics", his reply. "Since Einstein nothing really".

     The Universe cannot be discovered and visited with existing technology. A new age of discovery is needed.