Sunday, 17 January 2016

Straw Walker's Time Space Calculations

                             Calculating Space Contraction 


     A star's ability to alter time/space is one of the most intriguing phenomenon discovered in modern physics. A star is able to slow time and contract space by it's massive spinning magnetic field.

     This phenomenon has been detected and calculated by observing the delta time of radar being bounced back from a planet that is directly opposite our sun. The round trip differential time is approximately 200 microseconds. This experiment  has been redone many times since the mid 60's starting with Shapiro's experiments, to redefine the time to some 213 microseconds, but for simplicity sake, we'll calculate, a single pass delta time as 100 microseconds.

     There is 2 basic ways to change the velocity of a body.
1) Accelerate the body itself
2) Alter the medium that the body is travelling in to alter the overall velocity of the object.

     A star's magnetic field alters the medium that light is travelling in, not light itself. This has been calculated by the slowing of time by 100 microseconds.  Light travels in the medium of time and as time is slowed, the velocity of light appears to us as slowing. 

     Stars have different strengths of magnetic fields and this effects the amount of time that is slowed. As the time is further slowed, as in the case of a Black Hole, the relative speed of light approaches zero. When this occurs the object appears black. Light does not exist in a Black Hole.

     Space is also altered by the star's field strength, but unlike time, altered space cannot be detected. Not detected but can be determined by calculations.

Speed of light is;
     299,792,458 m/sec
The medium of time by our sun is slowed light by 100 microseconds, and is thus equal to the value of the space that is similarly contracted.

Thus by multiplying the delta time into the speed of light, the medium of space for our sun can be calculated as being contracted by 

                                                              29.9 km

The contraction of space, the medium that planets, comets and asteroids travel in, has the effect of accelerating these bodies as they approach the sun causing an elliptical orbit. 
This is observed and is known as Kepler's 2nd law. 

     To be brief: As space is contracted objects in this medium will accelerate, while time will slow giving a slower relative speed of light; conversely as space is expanded objects travelling in this space slow, while time speeds up and the relative speed of light increases.

     Is there any observed proof of our Sun contracting space? Some distance from the Sun's surface there is a region called the Corona. This is a region of extreme intense heat. The temperatures in this region are far greater than the Sun's surface, reaching over 1000 times greater than those temperatures reached on the surface. This seems unintuitive. The question is why the great temperature difference that seems to defy known science?

     The answer; space contraction and the slowing of time. As space is contracted and time is slowed the region is superheated sending temperatures much higher than would be predicted.

                                  Hinode's View of Interface Region
     In the figure above hot surface plasma is being pulled into the Sun's corona as space is being contracted in three dimensions. This gives rise to temperatures reaching as much as 10 million Kelvin in the Sun's atmosphere, compared to a mere 6000 Kelvin on the sun's surface.
     In Red Giant stars their magnetic fields do not extend past their central core. This results in lower surface temperatures, and a shift in the star's colour as the superheated corona disappears. Red Giants do not have a superheated corona that our Sun has, which gives life on our planet Earth.  

       A proposed experiment to give evidence that space is being contract as time is slowed by the Sun's corona.

      Einstein used an experiment of eclipsed light to prove space time is altered as it passed near a star. This same experiment can also be used to prove altered space time occurs in the suns corona as space is  contracted and time is slowed. This experiment would use a Red Giant star and demonstrate that altered space time occurs as light passes near its  surface, but not as expected, since Red Giants are without a corona.  

      Pulsars emit large amounts of energy, which allows us to detect them.  Their emitted energy is from radio wavelengths all the way to gamma rays. The later is in the shorter wavelength, and higher in energy, while at the same time Pulsars are contracting space. How Pulsars generate this energy is unknown.

      At the other end of the spectrum Red Giants are net consumers of energy. Red Giants are emitting energy at longer wavelengths, and lower energy, as they continue to expand space and grow in size. This is observed two fold. First in their shift in colour to red which is a longer wavelength of light and secondly their tremendous growth in expanded space. Pulsars and Red Giants are really opposites of the same equation.

      Time space is altered when using a Red Giant instead of a star as in Einstein's experiment, but the results will be opposite.  Light's relative velocity will increase as it passes near a Red Giant.


The Universe conserves energy. time and space to exist. When space is contracted and time is slowed energy is emitted. When space is expanded and time is accelerated energy is consumed. 

     Gravity is simply a function of time and space. This is evident in Jupiter. Jupiter emits a tremendous amount energy. This energy does not reduce the mass of Jupiter as would be expected  therefore causing Jupiter's orbit to decay, but Jupiter's orbit remains static. This emitted energy, similar to a pulsar's energy,is a result  of Jupiter's ability to alter time/space.  As space is contracted and time is slowed, energy is emitted.

     Underneath Jupiter's outer atmosphere this time/space alteration is concentrated near the planets surface. A visible evidence of this on Jupiter is the outer atmospheres tremendous rotational velocities. Contracted space is the cause for the high velocities. If it wasn't for this, Jupiter's surface pressures would be extremely high.

     Also evident is the  and moons of Jupiter having elliptical orbits. As space is contracted orbit's are maintained. The effect from contracted space is positive gravity, while the effect from expanded space is negative gravity.

     Negative gravity results in levitation and the ability to lift extreme weight.
     Positive gravity results in acceleration and the ability to reach extreme velocities.

The universe doesn't see the world as we commonly do.
     We see 2 plus 2 as equaling 4, while the universe sees 2 and 2 as 4.
Contracted space doesn't produce positive gravity, contracted space is positive gravity

Therefore contracted space has to equate to the Sun's force of gravity. The Sun contracts 29.9 kms. in 100 microseconds, which equals 29,900 km/ sec squared as the Sun's force of gravity.

The Sun's ability to alter time space by a very small almost imperceptible amount results in a very large effect. This small change in time space directly contributes to the Sun forming the Solar system and heating our planet, which gives us life.

     Man found early in history that from a few small pieces of coal he was able to heat his home and cook his meals. Much later man discovered that some 20 isotopes of nature were able to produce a continuous reaction called fission. From the small reactions of fission came forth enough energy to heat and light a city. Now mankind is on the verge of understanding the greatest secret of the universe. How a very small alteration in time space will produce an unbelievable amount of energy.

     This energy can be used for good or bad.  Hence man becomes God,because this energy has the power to destroy planets.

     Kepler's 3rd law which Newton used to formulate his gravity equation, is the Square
of the orbital period (yrs) divided by the cube of the semi major axis to equal a constant.

Image result for keplers 3rd law

T (y)

Distance above are in metres not "au" and periods are in earth years.
The sun's contacted space in metres is 2.99 X 10 4th power

This constant indicates the Sun's time space alteration extends throughout the solar system, which allows the force of gravity to be a constant at any point in the solar system.

Newton's large "G" is a constant on our solar system, but would this value be the same in the numerous solar systems through-out the universe?

for further reading; Pulsars; the Universe's Most Powerful Object

Saturday, 1 August 2015

Does Dark Matter Really Exist

                                                          Dark Matter

     A noted astronomer Vera Rubin, was able to detect with accuracy an unusual phenomenon. Galaxies rotate around their central mass quite differently than our planets orbit around our Sun in our solar system.

     In our solar system planets are free to orbit independently of each other, (minus planetary gravitational tugs) and follow the physical laws of nature as outlined by Kepler and Newton. The further out planets orbit the Sun the slower they travel. As an example using Pluto. Pluto's orbital speed is a mere fast walk compared to the blistering speed of Mercury's orbit.

     In Rubin's detailed analysis, galaxies seem to break the laws of known physics. The further out you travel in a galaxy, orbital speed slightly increases. Also conversely the closer to the centre of the galaxy the slower galaxy is orbiting.

     These results are not what would have been expected.

     Astronomers were quick to explain this seemingly contradiction in scientific law. The resulting conclusion was there had to been an unknown and therefore an unseen mass accounting for this irregularity in predicted results. Hence Dark Matter was postulated and has been accepted into the scientific community.

      Why the discrepancy in our solar system v.s. a galaxy?

There is three basic errors made in comparing the two systems.

1) The planets in our solar system orbit independently of each other while the star systems in a galaxy do not. In fact they are tied to each other.
2) The closest star systems in a galaxy are nearly fixed to the central mass while those further out from the centre of the star systems are being dragged or pulled along. This causes the whole system as a whole to rotate in one direction This is not in any way similar to the independent orbiting of our planets around the Sun which follow the laws of angular conservation.
3)  The central mass of a galaxy is not as described by Einstein theorists. A mass so great that light cannot escape causing a singularity. The central mass of a galaxy has two or more immense pulsars orbiting extremely fast in a very tight inner orbit. These fast orbiting pulsars are what causes the pulling action and rotation on the star systems in their respective galaxies.

Pulsars are different than any known object. They have the ability to contract space in a very pronounced manner. This contraction of space, scientifically reported in "03, is what causes the orbital behavior of a galaxy.

In the whirlpool galaxy above, note that the stars are seemingly attached like spokes on a wheel around the spinning central mass.This is not similar in anyway to our orbiting planets.
As these stars are being dragged along in unison those further out from the centre will possess higher orbital velocities. Just like a whip is being rotated over your head. The tip of the whip will travel at higher speeds.

     The number of Pulsars at the centre of a galaxy can actually be determined, by simply counting the spokes on the wheel of the spinning galaxy. Each Pulsars is accounting for a similar number of star systems in it's grasp.

      A galaxy that seems to have a continuous rotation of star systems indicates the degree how tight the Pulsars are orbiting and at what velocity.

      Why does the rotational orbits of galaxies not follow the conservation of angular motion? Simply because the Pulsars in the centre of the Black Holes are too strong. Unlike our Sun, Pulsars do not release mass (star clusters)  into an elliptical orbit, but continue to drag them ever closer to their centre.

      Why does the orbital velocity approach zero as star mass nears the centre of the galaxy? The closer to the centre of the galaxy time begins to slow. As light travels in the medium of time, at the very centre of the galaxy, or at the emergence of the black hole, time approaches zero or nearly stops and lights relative velocity acts the same. The object at the centre is now black.

By using a computer simulation of orbital velocity  and distances between star clusters as they approach the centre of a galaxy, are both approaching zero. Believe what you observe.

There can only be one conclusion. The centre of the galaxy is contracting space and slowing time.
Galaxy rotational rates do NOT contravene any scientific law.
Therefore Dark Matter does NOT exist.

     Pulsars are naturally attracted to each other. Their huge spinning magnetic field contracts space and slows time, which inevitably draws two Pulsars together into an ever stronger and decaying orbit. Any star cluster in the region will also be drawn into this ever more powerful dance.

    This is the beginning formation of a black hole and how a galaxy is initially formed.

For further reading: Blog. Pulsars: the Universe's most Powerful Object

Sunday, 8 March 2015

Pulsars; The Universe's Most Powerful Object

    Pulsars are very dense stars that produce extremely strong magnetic fields, up to a 1010 tesla field . Their magnetic poles (from the illustration) are not aligned with their axis of rotation, which as they rotate on this axis, casts their radiation emissions, in a wide sweep across the Universe. This may hit the Earth and be detected. It has been found that these pulses of radiation have a precise time interval as the star rotates each time.


    This magnetic field is so strong it will not allow life to exist. The field strength is able to even distort matter itself. Hydrogen and Helium atoms are distorted in a vacuum space that becomes polarized. This polarization of space produces a birefringent effect.. Atomic atoms extend into rod shapes as reported by an article in '03 Scientific American. The Hydrogen atom becomes a spindle 200 times narrower than it's normal shape.

     This indicates that magnetic fields spinning through space can distort space itself. Is this the cause of the time space distortion that Einstein first demonstrated as light past a distant Stars magnetic field?
     Is this what caused the time space distortion in Shapiro's experiments in the mid 1960's? The spinning magnetic field of the Sun.
     Is this the same reason that Black Spots do not emit light from their surface, as they are distorting time space? Black Spots have marginal or no measurable mass, but demonstrate large and very active magnetic fields. Are these magnetic fields in Black Spots that are causing a distortion of  time space?

      Birefringent is responsible for the double reflection of light that can been seen through certain crystals. The object appears twice when viewed through this polarized material or space. Light rays take two parallel paths as it passes through this polarized medium.

As seen by this crystal, as illustrated above, the object appears twice.
      Could not this be the reason for Einstein's explanation of Gravitational Lensing. Distant grouping of stars are seen twice when viewed through a telescope.
     The first gravitational lens was found in 1979 by Dennis Walsh, Robert F. Carswell and Ray J. Weymann, who identified the double quasar Q0957+561 as a double image of one and the same distant quasar, produced by a gravitational lens.

                                          Double quasar Q0957+561, seen here as two bright white disks
The effect of double refraction can been seen in the illustration above, due to a Pulsars extremely strong spinning magnetic field polarizing space...this effect that has long been determined to be from Einstein's Mass/Gravity theory.

University of Peking, China recently put forth this interesting theory;
     It is suggesting that a number of Pulsars are orbiting near the centre of a galaxy, and may be causing the distortion in time space that has been attributed to Einsteins Black Holes. Black Holes have never seen but their effects are observed. Theories suggest their mass is so large, no light can emit it's surface,
     Are the Pulsar's massive spinning magnetic fields responsible for this distorting time space?

Pulars, if existing and detectable in the immediate vicinity of the massive black hole (MBH) in the Galactic center (GC), may be used as a superb tool to probe both the environment and the metric of the central MBH. The recent discovery of a magnetized pulsar in the GC suggests that many more pulsars should exist near the MBH. In this paper, we estimate the number and the orbital distribution of pulsars in the vicinity of the MBH in the GC by assuming that the pulsar progenitors, similar to the GC S-stars, were captured to orbits tightly bound to the MBH through the tidal breakup of stellar binaries. We use the current observations on both the GC S-stars and the hypervelocity stars to calibrate the injection rate(s) of and the dynamical model(s) for the stellar binaries. By including the relaxation processes, supernova kicks, and gravitational wave radiation in our simulations, we estimate that \~{}97-190 (9-14) pulsars may presently orbit the central MBH with semimajor axes łt}=4000 AU (łt}=1000 AU), which is compatible with the current observational constraints on the number of the GC pulsars. The semimajor axis and the pericenter distance of the pulsar closest to the central MBH are probably in the range of \~{}120-460 AU and \~{}2-230 AU, respectively. Future telescopes, such as the Square Kilometer Array, may be able to detect a significant number of pulsars with semimajor axis smaller than a few thousand AU in the GC. Long-term monitoring of these pulsars would be helpful in constraining both the environment and the metric of the central MBH. Our preferred model also results in about ten hyperfast pulsars with velocity {\gt}\~{} 1500 km s1 moving away from the Milky Way. 

        Does this alter our view, of the Universe? 

It would indicate that a magnetic field in a certain set of  circumstance, can create a phenomenon that  contracts time and space.
Now mankind needs to artificially reproduce this in a lab.  

To reproduce the magnetic field of a Pulsar is not within the realm of our ability, nor would we attempt such a project fully knowing the detrimental effects of such a force.

But; water can easily be polarized and when using a spinning magnetic field it will produce a spinning polarization of the water molecule. When water is polarized the Hydrogen atoms take an opposite charge to the Oxygen atom, which in effect can weaken or strengthen the molecule depending on external forces. When in a spinning magnetic field, certain sub atomic particles spin in the same direction as the field.

Now by placing a diamagnetic material perpendicular to the field, a magnetic field "mirror" is produced. Bismuth and Mercury are the two strongest diamagnetic elements known.

This in effect duplicates what a Pulsar does in space..

Time is the most valuable commodity in the Universe. If altering time can be artificially created then all other committees have exactly no value. Distance traveled in the Universe becomes a moot point if the time required is negligible. Turn time into a commodity.

For Further  reading;

                                     Blog;{For Man to Become God}

Saturday, 23 August 2014

For Man To Become God

     A number of interesting experiments were conducted in the mid 60's, by a team of scientists led by Irwin Shapiro. Shapiro devised an experiment to prove Einstein's relativity of time slowing and the Sun's gravity would curve space thereby forcing light to travel a longer distance as it passed by the Sun. This delta change in time could be measured by Shapiro's experiment.

 His experiment was to direct a radar signal to Saturn and have the signal bounce off Saturn and then upon it's return to earth measure the time incurred. He would then repeat the experiment with the Sun essentially between the Earth and Saturn. This experiment was eventually done using a number of planets and the effect of the planets seems to be quite negligible.

     As previously determined when light passes the Sun or star it takes longer to complete the round trip. This was confirmed by Shapiro's experiment.

     Now with the results of his experiments he was now able to "reverse engineer" an equation to satisfy the results. He knew all of Einstein's 10 equations of relativity theory equations including those on mass and gravity and how it would alter time space, so he used Einstein's theories to develop his equation.

     Shapiro knew the following
1) c, Speed of light
2) G, Newton's Gravity Constant
3) M, Mass of the Sun
4) GM, Therefore he was able to calculate the Sun's gravity constant.
5) Distances from Earth to Saturn,

     His final equation, is stated as

\Delta t=-\frac{2GM}{c^3}\log(1-\mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{x})

and really an extension in many ways to Schwarzschild's equation determined in 1916.

     When a scientists "reverse engineers" an equation to prove a theory, it often becomes a self fulfilling result. Shapiro used Schwarschild's equations which gave more of an exact solution to Einstein's field equations, which describe the interactions of gravity as it curves space time. By using an extension of Einstein's theory your conclusions are already predetermined and become self fulfilling. Is this scientific?

     For a moment let us go back in time to 1964. Only this time it's not Shapiro that is conducting these experiments but someone named Straw Walker. There is also one other important difference...Einstein has never been born. Now would the resulting equation be the same?

     After the conclusion of these same experiments; Straw Walker is amazed that time/space is somehow altered by the Sun, but unlike Einstein, he doesn't see that the mass and gravity of the Sun is relevant. (remember Einstein's equation does't exist)

     Straw Walker believes the spinning magnetic field of the Sun is causing the time space distortion. He also believes as that light travels in the medium of time. This is opposite to Einstein's theory that light travels in the medium of the curved space as it by passes the mass of the Sun. This curved space acts as a 2 dimensional  plane, as it warps around the mass of the Sun.

     Straw Walker alternatively uses the magnetic field of the Sun to "reverse engineer" an equation to come up with the exact detected results. As in both equations the time variance is not dependent on the total distant travelled by the beam, but only as it passes near the Sun. Whether the beam is bounced off Mars or Jupiter the results will remain constant.

     Maxwell was a Tesla/Einstein type genius. His equations developed in the mid 1800's were laws that showed the interaction of electricity, magnetic fields and magnetism. They were laws because their results were tested by various experiments, though today in some instances they do not apply. His equation were left on the very doorstep of Einstein's later equations of light and time.

     Straw Walker uses Maxwell's equations to demonstrate that the Sun's magnetic field is distorting space time, and not the mass of the Sun. Instead of producing a curvature to space, the Sun magnetic field contracts space and slows time nearest the Sun. As an object enters this contracted space it accelerates to it's nearest point to the sun, (perigee) as demonstrated by a planet's orbits and then slows as it leaves this contracted space. Light reacts quite differently to the Sun's magnetic field. Instead of light's relative velocity increasing, it does the opposite and slows.

      The real question is why? Einstein won his Nobel Prize by stating that light has mass, so then why is there a discrepancy between a planet velocity increasing and light's relative velocity decreasing.

      Light doesn't travel in the medium of space, but travels in the medium of time. As time is slowed by the Sun's magnetic field the speed of light appears to us as slowing. The  velocity of light is left unchanged but it's medium is slowed therefore a delta time is observed. Like an aircraft flying in it's medium of air and facing a head wind, the aircraft's air speed indicator is unchanged, but it's ETA to it's destination as changed. This is what happens to light as it enters into altered time. Light appears to slow from the observer, as if facing a head wind of slowing time, which results in a change in it's time of arrival.

Maxwell commented in 1864: "agreement of the results seems to show that light and magnetism are affections of the same substance, and that light is an electromagnetic disturbance propagated through the field according to electromagnetic laws."

     Therefore Straw Walker deducted that the Sun's magnetic field and NOT the mass of the Sun was causing the anomalies in the time/space results as light passed near the Sun.

     The conclusions reached either by contracted space or curved space were exactly the same except the theories are different. It's like Einstein's theory is 2+2 =4, while Straw Walker's equation is 3+1 =4. Both give the same results but from different theories.

     From a practical sense there is one extremely important difference in these two theories. Einstein's equations using mass to distort time/space cannot be artificially reproduced while Straw Walkers equation to simulate slowing of time and contracting space can be man made.. By controlling time and space, man then; "Has become God."

     Maxwell Wave Equation; States any Electromagnetic Plane wave travels at the speed of light and acts as light.

 \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf E}{\partial t^2} - \nabla^2 \mathbf E = 0\,, \quad
 \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf B}{\partial t^2} - \nabla^2 \mathbf B = 0\,,

Straw Walker knows;
1) Maxwell's equations
2) Magnetic field  of the Sun
3) c speed of light
4) d distances between planets
5) Shapiro's results
6) B Sun's magnetic field

Thus find c; by inserting Shapiro's time difference of 200 microsecond into the equation.
c will show a small decrease in speed, indicating a slowing of time.

     In essence Man has become God

 Arabic word for doubt is;  شك

     In the 1st Century Islamic scientists believed that the 1st step to advance science was to doubt. In their time it was to doubt the ancient Greek understanding of the Cosmology of the Universe and particularly the Solar system and how the observed solar system related to mathematical data.

     It is the same today. We must always doubt if science is to advance. Does Einstein's theory of curved space to explain gravity relate to what's observed? The planets orbit in the Solar System on a flat plane and show no orbital curve. The galaxies are flat as a pancake as they orbit their central mass of the black holes and show no curvature to their orbits. If curved space exists and explains gravity then why does light "slow" as it passes through curved space and planets passing through this same curved space accelerate, as they follow Kepler's 2nd law? If space is curved would not they both react the same?

     Einstein studied Maxwell's equations and used his ideas to eventually allow him to develop his own equations.  Why did Einstein do a 180 degree turn from Maxwell's equations which were proven by experiment and use mass and Newton's gravity constant in his equation when Maxwell clearly stated that light is related to a electromagnetic phenomenon and not related to mass?

     Later in 1888 Heinrich Hertz released an important paper relating to Maxwell's earlier studies. He went on to conduct experiments to verify that electromagnetic waves exhibit lightlike behaviors of reflection, refraction, diffraction, and polarization, and later determined empirically the speed of wave travel is the same as the speed of light.  Previous to this, electromagnetic fields travelling in space were not understood, but from these findings, Einstein later developed his gravity wave theory that he postulated would travel through space. 

     Was Einstein wrong? To doubt is the 1st sign of genius.

     The Rosetta satellite upon landing on Comet 67P would give the scientific community an excellent  opportunity to test Einstein's curved space theory.


     Have the Rosetta satellite's probe fix it's instruments on the North star as it orbits the Sun. If Einstein is correct and mass curves space, then as the comet orbit is close to it's perigee there should be an angle deflection, indicating the satellite and comet are travelling in a curved path.

     I predict NO such angle deflection is noted.

For further reading;  {Pulsars; The Universe's Most Powerful Object Blog}

Monday, 18 August 2014

Why is it Difficult to Advance Knowlege

                                                     Advancing knowledge

     Human beliefs once indoctrinated in our youth are stronger than steel. They do not bend or break. Take religious beliefs. Religious beliefs taught to a youth, are with us the rest of our lives and influence the choices we make. Just look at the Christian community of the United States and how these beliefs transcend to daily living and more importantly foreign policy.

      The Middle East and their religious beliefs and how this interacts with their daily lives and international policies. Beliefs once learned and adopted are impossible to bend.

     Not just religious beliefs, but academic knowledge of well known theories, when taught at a young impressionable age becomes doctrine. Young teenage students leaving home and entering University are extremely impressionable and are the first to accept, new and exciting beliefs.

     In the settings and surrounding of this new University life they are quick to believe, such theories as Einsteins equation of General Relativity, which includes Gravity Waves and Orbital decay as part of the equation, which neither have been detected in the Solar System. Einstein's curved space theory becomes easily accepted, but cannot be demonstrated in nature, as the planets in the Solar system orbit the Sun on a flat plane and show no sign of curved space. The theories of Big Bang and Dark Matter are quickly taught as facts and not as they should be as just another theory.

                                              {Einstein Backwards Blog}

    There is nothing wrong with having theories, after all; how does scientific knowledge advance without someone taking academic chances. Theories are necessary in the thinking process.

    The problem arise when theories are taught as fact.This then has the opposite effect and actually limits the advancement of knowledge.

   This can only be more highlighted by the findings by the University of Northern Carolina.

*  More Soft Dinosaur Tissue, Now from an "80 Million" Year Old Hadrosaur: Consistent with the expectations of biblical creationists, according to Nat'l Geographic, there's yet another discovery of soft tissue in a dinosaur, this time, a hadrosaur, with soft blood vessels, connective tissue, and blood cell protein amino acid chains partially sequenced at Harvard University. This allegedly 80-million year-old non-fossilized duck-billed dinosaur tissue was discovered by a team led by researchers at North Carolina State University. Harvard, et al., wanted to get some soft dinosaur tissue so they put together a team and just went out and found some. Consider all the potential soft tissue, and perhaps even DNA, lost to humanity because of secular universities ignoring previous claims by young-earth creationists due to the false evolutionary timescale which so biased paleontologists that they would never even look for non-decomposed original biological tissue inside of dinosaur bones.

     Nobody is denying that Dinosaurs existed and that they are now extinct. The question is when did they go extinct.
The fact that soft tissue has been found really puts in question whether Dinosaurs went extinct 65 to 70 million years ago. 

     The possibility of soft tissue still existing after nearly 100 million years is  NOT believable.    

     There is more evidence that Dinosaurs did not go extinct 70 million years ago.


     There is numerous cave drawing of Dinosaurs and these drawing are NOT 75 million years old. In fact they are not 100 thousand years old, but more like less than 10 thousand years  old..



    Numerous figurines through out the world show distinctly that dinosaurs existed on earth and were drawn and formed into figurines by ancient man that were on earth 10 thousand years ago.

    If numerous facts, point to Dinosaurs living on earth 10 thousand years ago and were not extinct 70 million years ago as understood and believed, then why does not the scientific community not accept these finding and change their beliefs?

     They cannot.

     Once beliefs are learned they become steel; they do not bend or break. Anthropologist have spent their entire careers preaching their doctrine. They are not to be doubted, so instead of having interest in finding the "truth of Human History" they will take whatever measures necessary to disavow and discredit all those that may suggest that the finding in Northern Carolina are true..

     That is the measure of advancing becomes extremely difficult simply by the nature of man.
Their beliefs become their doctrine and their doctrine becomes dogma.

Advancements or Improvements

     The great advancements in human history occurred shortly after the turn of the 1900 hundreds, with some of the worlds greatest inventions and discoveries occurring during the Second World War. Mankind literally went from horse and buggy to rockets and jets in a matter of 50 years. This  period was truly was the age of of enlightenment.
     The gasoline and diesel engines were developed during this time and still in use today. The consumer use of electricity was introduced with the exclusive help of Tesla and powers our world today. The telephone, radio, radar and sonar were all founded early for today's world of consumer and military products. Two Germans and a Swede discovered nuclear fission  in 1938 and soon after an atomic bomb was used in war, and saw the beginning study of nuclear physics.BMW and Messerschmidt developed the first production jet aircraft with the use of swept wing technology during WW2. A great German scientist developed the first mass produced rocket that later in America would put a man on the moon. Messerschmidt developed a rocket powered jet, the Comet, that nearly broke the sound bearer during the war, and could have if the German's had the time to develop it  further. Even technologies that are considered new as in superconductivity were discovered early in the 1900's. The development of plastics and the field of organic chemistry along with their numerous organic reactions were discovered years ago.
     No other period in history can match this short 50 year period. Science was born in this short time frame.
     What does all this say in relation to modern post WW2 discoveries? 
     There has been some notable consumer product improvements, computers using circuit boards instead of tubes, phones are now carried as hand held devices instead of a phone on a desk at home, dishwasher and clothes washers have automatic cycles, and there are numerous more antibiotics now than in WW2, but all these are just improvements not great discoveries.

     If all the discoveries in man's history were given a predetermine value of importance, starting in the horse and buggy era of 1900 to our modern world today it would only be a value of ONE.

     If mankind is to discover and colonize the Universe a discovery value of 1000 will be required.
Man's knowledge cannot be stuck in a dogma of religious views and  academic egos.
Knowledge has often stalled in the past as it has now. A sailor on one of  Columbus's ships discovering the new world would have been well at home on a naval ship in America's war against King George in their war of independence.

      A theoretical physics professor was once asked. "What's new in physics", his reply. "Since Einstein nothing really".

     The Universe cannot be discovered and visited with existing technology. A new age of discovery is needed.

Sunday, 1 June 2014

The Anunnaki The Great Gods of the Sumerians

                                      The Anunnaki

     The Sumerian text speak of their Great gods called the Anunnaki, which can have several meaning, but the Anu were the heavenly ones and Ki translates as earth, so the word Anunnaki could literally translate, "Those from heaven that were sent to earth"

    Compared to the Sumerians the Anunnaki were very well dressed and groomed. Their breads were long and braided and their dress was formal and heavily embroidered.

                                        Anunnaki Watch Water Offering Water Sumerian Gods                   

     In the image above an Anunnaki is seen wearing  his formal dress and having well groomed long hair and a braided beard. This was not only how they dressed, but it was signifying their position and who they were.
The early Kings of Mankind's history copied this dress, and braided beards, to indicate their status as royal. The female Pharaoh's of Egypt would even wore false braided beards to indicate kingship.

     The image above is the King of Assyria and the King of Babylon seen while they are shaking hands.What is of note is their dress and braided breads. Their attire is solely for their royal status, copied from the Anunnaki whom they saw as the pinnacles of status.

     The Sumerian text records the Anunnaki as coming from heaven to Earth, but they were definitely human. They were not spirit forms. They had the ability of long everlasting life, but they were not immortal and could die, either by accident or by combat. They seemed to enjoy the contact with mankind and enjoyed the pleasures of the women of Sumeria.

     The relationship with the Sumerians took a symbiotic relationship, with the Sumerians acquiring scientific, agriculture, husbandry and mathematical  knowledge from the Anummaki, while the Anunnaki received labour to irrigate and grow crops, produce beer and most importantly mine significant amounts of ore.

     The Anunnaki were administrated by a council, and the council had leaders. Enki was one such great leader and his name means, En translates as lord and Ki translates as Earth. so therefore Enki was the "Lord of the Earth". All important issues were discussed at these council meetings and agreed upon. Any criminal or civil action could also fall under the authority of the council. As a case in point of a rape charge against a high ranking Anunnaki. The girl was brought before the council and questioned, then cross examined. Similar to a modern court drama. The result was the Plaintiff was found guilty.

     The first thing the Anunnaki did upon arriving on Earth was to construct a city. Enki builds what is considered the first city built on Earth named Eridu, at the southern end of the Mesopotamia valley, and in this city a temple is built. The text reads;

"Next to Anu he seated EnlilNintu he seated at the big side, The Anunnaki seated themselves one after the other. Enlil says to the Anunnaki: " Ye great gods who are standing about, My brother has built a house, the king Enki; Eridu, like a mountain, he has raised up from the earth, In a good place he has built it. Eridu, the clean place, where none may enter, The house built of silver, adorned with lapis laz uli,"


The mound of the ancient city of Eridu, located in southern Iraq. There is also topographical evidence that the city once had lakes surrounding it. 

     One of the pleasures Enki has while living in his city, was to go for a boat ride on the lakes near Eridu,, really not much different than people today enjoying the water. Below is an ancient illustration of Enki in his boat;


      Next was the construction of the temple, which was elaborate and extensive. The question is; what was it's purpose?Modern archaeologists believe that being a temple, they must have served as a religious importance, but is this true? Others suggest ancient temples were aligned with the stars or constellations. And still others believe that they were aligned with the spring equinox or the summer solstice.

      What was special about these temples that were constructed in ancient Sumerian cities, was they were not constructed for the Sumerians. Either for their use as in worship or as a centre for their culture. The temples were built for the absolute sole use of the Anunnaki. This point is very clear.

     The temples were called Ziggurats, The Ziggurats were constructed of 7 levels rising above the city with their corners, not their sides pointing to the four compass direction points. There was no astrological connection to their positioning, or an alignment to the spring equinox or summer solstice. The Anunnaki were highly intelligent and didn't require a building site to determine the approaching of spring or when summer was near. So the question still remains what were these temples built for? Below the Ziggurat at the ancient site of Ur, which had been rebuilt many times over the Centuries.


     Just as Ancient Mankind copied the dress and appearance of the Anunnaki they also copied their temples. The Egyptians long before they built pyramids they built exact replicas of Sumerian Ziggurats. They were called Mastabas and like the Ziggurats they were built from clay bricks.


     The Mastabas (above) had the same tier leveling architecture, in following with the Ziggurats of Mesopotamia. The Egyptians understood the style of construction but as with the Sumerians they never understood their purpose.The Egyptians determined them to be burial sites for their Kings. The Anunnaki though had no concern for a burial site since they had the opportunity for everlasting life.The ancient cuneiform text reads;
            What you seek you shall never find.
          For when the Gods made man 
          they kept immortality for themselves.

     The unified ruler of ancient Egyptian under King Djoser in the aerial photo above, shows his pyramid with it's 7 steps at Saqqara. Pyramid temples were built near the centre of a complex indicating their importance.

     These temples were extremely important to the Anunnaki as many of their reliefs show them atop their Ziggurats. At the top to the Ziggurats was the temple centre piece, and this substantiated the existence of the Temple itself. This singular important location was what the Anunnaki called the ABZU. The meaning of Abzu is distant or deep water. Ab translates as water and Zu as distant/ deep.

      The Abzu is something more than just distant water, as this text suggest; "Abzu the pure place where the fates are determined".
      The Abzu was central to their very lives for without it, the Anunnaki would loose their longevity to their exsistence.
                                              {The Sumerian Abzu Blog}

     In the Sumerian tale of the Turtle and Ninurta, Enki sets an ambush at the gate of the Abzu, and traps Ninurta.
Against Ninurta, Enki fashioned a turtle from the clay of the abzu. Against him he stationed the turtle at an opening, at the gate of the abzu.

This gate is at the top of the temple Ziggurat.


     The above image shows an Anunnaki that has climbed atop the Ziggurat, (illustrated by the cone shaped objects, as if indicating the 7 tiers of the Ziggurat itself), and making entreaty to Enki seen siting at the gate of the Abzu, surrounded by water. (also illustrated as the door atop the coned Ziggurat just above the Anunnaki)

      These pyramid shaped temples were built wherever the Anunnaki resided on earth. In Egypt and in South and Central America some these magnificent structures still remain. Centuries later long after the disappearance of the Anunnaki, mankind chose to use them for their own purposes. These temples then became central to the religious beliefs of man. These temples then changed from their original purpose to become part of an after life and a venerated burial site for mankind.  To this day archaeologists believe that the Great Pyramid was built by the Old Kingdom of Egypt. A civilization that up to that point in history showed little ability to build such an empowering structure.

    In 1822, the Italian Egyptologist Bernardino Drovetti discovered a mysterious papyrus document near the Thebe’s necropolis. It dates back to the Dynasty, during Ramesses II reign.
This document was called the Turin Royal Canon  and speaks about  Zep tepi or the First time of Osiris.

    The main characteristic of this document is a long list of Kings of Egypt that ruled Egypt pre diluvian, before the thirty dynasties that scholars today officially approve. This gives rise to a much longer period of a sophisticated society living in Egypt, when the Great Pyramid was originally built. The sequence of the King's listed, originated some 33,000 years before the dynasty age.

What gives credence to this document is that the Sumerian King List also lists ruling Kings in the Valley of Sumer, that ruled in this pre flood era. Two unrelated documents  that both record the same history, make the history authentic. Scholars still do not accept this as history, but see this period as simple myths.

John Anthony West proposed his reasoning, absolutely worthy, when he wrote:

As if today's Egyptologists know more about ancient Egyptian history than the ancient Egyptians themselves. That is the standard height of academic arrogance

(West’s research was dating the Sphinx extensive water erosion that can be seen from atop the Sphinx)

Who did build the Great pyramid? Most scholars believe that Khufu was responsible for the earth’s greatest construction feat, pointing to his cartouche in the Campbell's chamber as giving evidence.

Fig. 1 above is the existing cartouche in the Great Pyramid

Fig. 2. Below is the cartouche recorded in Vyse’s journal.

    In May 27th 1837 Col. Vyse recorded in his  journal a cartouche he discovered  in the Great Pyramid. What is bizarre about his cartouche is that it does not spell Khufu’s name correctly, Vyse’s cartouche has since been modified in a restoration to correctly spell Khufu’s name as indicated in Fig. 1 to support the belief of the builder of the Great Pyramid. This oddity is not the most unusual detail about a King recording his name on such a  magnificent structure.

The Great Pyramid has no painting, no art work, no painted drawings, no inscribed depictions and no stone cutting depicting a language or figure.

    If you were a great King of Egypt; would you send someone to misspell your name in paint which fades through time, in one of the most difficult and obscure locations in the pyramid, when the whole of the pyramid is entirely bare?

    Who painted this mispelled  cartouche?  None other than Vyse himself. He painted the cartouche of Khufu to gain for himself fame,fortune and note aridity, thus being the first to identify the builder of the Great Pyramid. If he drew the cartouche in a well known visible location in the pyramid it would have been quickly seen as a fake, but hiding the cartouche in a very difficult location would allow his fiendish plan to be accepted.

    Since then, scholars have been misled to believe that Khufu was the builder of one of the seven wonders of the world.  The normal evidence of the steps required to achieve such an imaginative process are lacking, and neither the physical construction nor the social philosophy behind it have no historical precedent in Egypt.

    Mankind may have started over several times throughout the millenniums of time that man has existed on earth. The great period of time before the diluvian epoch, gave rise to some advanced learning, which enabled the Egyptians to build great structures.The Great Pyramid and the Sphinx were both built during this time when the Gods ruled Egypt and walked among mankind.

       Many of the reliefs of the Great Gods show them having a 1/2 man half fish like appearance. In the relief below is a very common depictions showing the Anunnaki on either side of the tree of life and looking up and pointing to a chariot of the Gods. Their appearance is fish like.


      In one of the earliest known artifacts of a sculptured Anunnaki, dating around 5000 BC , the Anunnaki is wearing the horned headdress and long bread, indicating his status, but also what appears is that his skin, has a fish scale like appearance.

      Were the Anunnaki able to extend their lives as the relief seems to indicate with the help of their chariot of the Gods?

             {The Babylonian History of Mankind Included a Great Creature Named Oannes  blog}

Not just extend their lives, but change their form.

      By about 2000 BC the Anunnaki start to disappear throughout the earth. For what reason no one is sure. One suggestion is that they are losing their influence and power over mankind as man's earthly knowledge was superseding their need for the Anunnaki. They were no longer seen as Great Gods. One thing is sure is that one Anunnaki stayed on earth to influence man. That God was Dagan, the God of the Semitic people.

                                  { Dagan the First God of the Semitic People blog}

      Dagan was marooned on the earth, by Enki's  order. After the destruction of the Akkadian nation and it's great city Agade and just prior to the fall of Agade it's capital,  Enki orders all of it's treasury, of this great city, to be brought to his Abzu. Enki doesn't stop there but atop the Ziggurat at Agade the poles of the Abzu are to removed by his order, indicating that the function of the Abzu for Dagan is finished.

The text reads; “Ninurto brought the jewels of ruler ship, the royal crown, the emblem and the royal throne bestowed on Agade.”
                         "Enki tore out its well-anchored holy mooring pole from the abzu. Inana took away its weapons."
       Dagan at this point is alone, and without connection to the Abzu controlled by Enki, he is now isolated and marooned on earth. The text indicates that all the Anunnaki had turned against Dagan to destroy his Semitic seed, the Akkadians.

       Dagan then becomes the driven god of the Semitic people. To make them rulers of the Earth. His ego and lust for power seeks no end.

      The  Bible texts indicate what he has become; The God of the Semitic Akkadians had become a God of never ending “bragging”.  Isaiah 45; versus 11-21 is just one of the many examples, Job chapter 38 another. “I made the earth and I created man- I created the heavens”. There is pages upon pages of this never ending self posturing, incessant bragging. My point from all of this is; if there is a 'One God the creator”, that sees fit to come down from his heavenly place, and speak to a lowly human on earth, which can be no more than a fly speck in relation to the Universe, then why does he have to spend an inordinate amount of time bragging to this fly speck? Does he have some personal insecurity issues, or is this an attempt by Dagan/ Yehwah to support his need and human reliance and therefore vindicate his own agenda. I just cannot imagine an omnipotent God the Creator, to feel the satisfaction of man's approval, and the need to be worshiped. It sounds preposterous.

      Is there some indication that Dagan is still alive, influencing the world, or without the Abzu has he died as with all mankind?