Mercury and Pluto's Orbits

                                                 Mercury's and Pluto's Orbits

                            

     Einstein's theory of gravity waves emitting from a mass requires mass to lose energy and therefore lose mass. On a planetary scale that means planets in the solar system must have decaying orbits. This has been studied extensively and never found true. In his attempt to prove decaying orbits he needed to predicate mercury's orbit as decaying.

     The perturbation of Mercury's orbit is unusual but not necessarily unpredictable. It's orbit is a very pronounced elliptical orbit, that extends very close to the Suns atmosphere , at it's  perihelion. As it passes nearest the sun, it passes nearest the Corona, where a phenomena  effect occurs demonstrated 100 years ago by Einstein. All planetary orbit extending as far out as Saturn have this unusual orbital precession. 

     If we take the results of Shapiro's in the 1960s it is abundantly clear Einstein's theory that Mass curves space is false. As indicated from his research any, even the smallest incremental distance change from the Corona , the effect on light and it's relative velocity is zero. Einstein's curved space theory literally disappears. So these orbit perturbations are NOT from any theory of relativity.

     If we take the speed of light and factor in the medium time that light slowed as it passed through the corona it results in light slowing 100 microseconds. This time delta is the value of how much the corona effect, alters space and time. In particular the amount of space that has been contracted /compressed.

     29.9 km of space is continuously contracted. This small but significant amount that determines Mercury's  precession, and produces positive gravity through out the solar system. To be more specific, space is compressed from the phenomena of the Corona effect.

     The analogy is a spring, As a spring is compressed it's distance or total length of the wire doesn't change, but the space that the spring occupies is less, therefore space is compressed. Hence positive gravity.

       

     Pluto also has a pronounce elliptical orbit, that has an unusual tilt of 17 degrees from the Suns equator plane. Its orbit duration takes slightly more than 248 years. Hence Pluto's orbit has not been thoroughly studied. The Sun's gravity even at these distances does have an effect on Pluto's orbits. These effects are reflected in a decreasing tilt angle of the orbit as each orbit occurs. This effect is small but it's occurring. The problem facing the solar system is if the orbital flattens out it would endanger Neptune which has a similar orbital plane and orbital path.

                                  

      Was Pluto involved in a  planetary collision a 100 thousand years ago? That destroyed a planet that is now seen as the asteroid belt. Mars and it's two moon that are the closes planet to the  asteroid belt definitely show signs of a past massive collision.

Two Train Crashes

 Two Train Crashes

                         

Train "A" travelling to it's destination collides with a fixed object and suddenly stops abruptly.

Train "B" again travelling to its destination with the same parameters, also collides with an fixed object, but unlike Train "A" it continues through the crash site for several seconds.

     If all things are similar between the 2 trains, the conclusion would be, using momentum,  that train "B" has a larger mass than train "A" . 

     There also could be a second conclusion as to the cause for Train "B" collision.

Time may have slowed which would have resulted in Train "B" to pass through the crash site and travel further in time. This results in 2 possible outcomes resulting in the same crash cause. Exactly two possibilities that mirror each other.  

      The analogy would be the train is the speed of light and the crash site is the cornea.

     Einstein stated as an object approaches the speed of light it's mass approaches infinity. This would describe why more energy is required to push the object as it approaches closer to the speed of light. In fact all the energy of the Universe would be needed to approach the speed of light.. Einstein used classical physics to describe this phenomena. He also described the Black Hole phenomena as infinity mass to describe why light does not exist from a Black Hole. Again the use of classical physics to describe a phenomena.

     That's the mistake.  

Einstein correctly described lights relative velocity would slow as it passed through the Sun's cornea, Knowing the effect he again used classical physics to describe the cause. Mass curves space and creates a longer distance for light to travel, causing it's relative velocity to slow.

     That's the mistake.

The Corona effect and the Black Hole are caused by the same phenomena that slows time.

The only difference is the scale of the event. In both cases light's velocity is slowed. In the case of the Black Hole the velocity of light approaches zero. At this point light no longer exists.

      All these Infinity Mass and Infinity Energy get a bit daunting. 

      Einstein stated that mass would increase as an object approaches light speed, but he also said the opposite. Mass creates gravity waves , which are a cost to the mass in energy, which causes mass to loose it's mass.

     So which is it?  Does mass continually loose it's mass or does it gain mass?

To better understand Black Holes and the Universe at large the Sun's cornea effect must 1st be understood.